Monday, May 23, 2005

Dumbya BUSH




*quote from USA today- "Bush has threatened a veto, (on stem cell research), saying he will not use taxpayer money to 'promote science which destroys life in order to save life'."
Oh, OK. But you will start a war that murders people in order to (manipulate) preserve American life. Mine eyes can see the folly of the Bush's White House...

Did everyone in this country forget that Dick, Bush, and Colon lied about the Iraqis, and that they don't have WMD's, that there were no insurgents until we arrived, that they financed al-Q as little as the United States Of America did, that many other countries that we are sycophantic to helps terrorism much more, oh yeah there is a war in Afghanistan on terrorism, and that we have the best war "machine" in the world an' that we could run all over the world and pick people off like ticks.

Bush: "You can run, but you can't hide." He said this to Kerry during the campaign. He also said this to Osama 'fore the war in Afghanistan. Yah, where is he then George? I suspect he has said this to Laura. He has also said, "Well, he isn't leading any parades. He's hiding." Well, no shit he's hiding. And they're having parades in bin Laden's honor nearly everyday.

"See, free nations are peaceful nations. Free nations don't attack each other. Free nations don't develop weapons of mass destruction." GwB Oct. 3, 2003. oh yeah, what about nuclear weapons, read history books, dumbass; and recollect your tenure. Holy fuck, i can't believe he is sooo dumb...

Do you think it would be so hard to get a president in office that could answer a question that he didn't know about beforehand? Isn't the president supposed to be exceptional? Before Tony Blair got re-elected he sat in front of about 40 people and TV cameras and they laid into him, gave'm a good rogerin'. And he was articulate. His opponents went through the same thing. Bob Dylan could handle an interview better than Bush.

Bush surprised at seeing Iraqi citizens, who ought to be grateful beneficiaries of the our occuliberation, demonstrating in support of Hezbollah. Well, at least he acknowledges it-that's unBushlike. Why would they oppose us? Could it be that over 3k civilian deaths in one month mean what we are doing there is not working?
Bush: "What's very interesting about the violence in Lebanon and the violence in Iraq and the violence in Gaza is this: These are all groups of terrorists who are trying to stop the advance of democracy." Bush sure doesn't choose his words very wisely. He has to know that Hezbollah and Hamas both participate in democratically elected governments. The U.S. backed president of Iraq, Talabani (nice name by the way, Talaban I), can't keep his own party from denouncing and slaughtering-al-Sadr. Talabani has also praised Hezbollah and denounced Isreal.
Democracy doesn't seem to be the medicine to cure terrorism. I'm sure Bush will never get that. Will we get new leadership in '08 that will think outside that box? Always being steadfast in your interests is not a good quality in a president. Some things you need to be stuborn with, but seeing the chaos you caused, you need to be like Gumby. This mess is going to last until it is someone else's problem. I hope we still hold GWB accountable. The last election forced Bush to recognize something has to change and he admitted to some past mistakes, (i.e. Iraq/Sept.11; no WMDs).

The Repubs chastised and insisted Kerry apoligize to the troops for his comment on education and direction. They misconstrued his words and recontexed his words to make him look like he was insulting them while he himself is a veteran. Then the candidate with no backbone did apoligize.
Where was this outcry when Bush made a video of himself looking in the oval office for WMDs?
Nowhere but Keith Olberman's office it seems...

No comments: